HomeTechWhistleblower claims Amazon violated UK sanctions by selling facial recognition tech to...

Whistleblower claims Amazon violated UK sanctions by selling facial recognition tech to Russia

Date:

Related stories

All bets off on trust for Tories as gambling scandal engulfs campaign

The Conservatives are facing electoral meltdown after the scandal...

The world’s best pastry shops have been revealed — full list of UK winners

When it comes to the world’s best pastry, obviously...

UK E. coli outbreak put at least 86 people in hospital

25 minutes agoBy Michelle Roberts, Digital health editor, BBC NewsGetty ImagesAt...

UK parties ignoring food shortage risks, say farming and retail bodies

Farmers and supermarkets have accused the main political parties...
spot_imgspot_img

An ex-employee has accused Amazon of breaching UK sanctions by selling facial recognition technology to Moscow following its invasion of Ukraine, The Financial Times reported.

Charles Forrest alleged that he was unfairly dismissed in 2023 after accusing Amazon of wrongdoing on a number of issues between November 2022 and May 2023, according to the article. The allegations were presented to a London employment tribunal as part of a hearing this week.

Forrest said that Amazon closed a deal with Russian firm VisionLabs to provide access to its Rekognition facial recognition technology. It did that “through what appears to be a shell company based in the Netherlands,” according to the tribunal filings. He also accused the company of breaking its self-imposed moratorium on police use of facial recognition tech implemented after the murder of George Floyd.

Amazon denied the allegations. “We believe the claims lack merit and look forward to demonstrating that through the legal process,” a spokesperson told the FT. “Based on available evidence and billing records, AWS did not sell Amazon Rekognition services to VisionLabs.”

Forrest was let go for “gross misconduct” after refusing to work his contractual hours and failed to respond to emails or attend meetings, Amazon alleged. It denied that Forrest made the sorts of disclosures that would entitle him to whistleblower protections.

Amazon appeared to acknowledge that it had breached its ban on police use of facial recognition tech, while adding that it didn’t break any laws. “A self-imposed moratorium does not amount to a legal obligation,” it said.

- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories

spot_img